reBuild Workshop · reSource

NYC Rowhouse Retrofit Inventory

Every high-performance, deep-energy retrofit of a New York City rowhouse we have been able to find, and an open request for the ones we have missed.

Version 0.9 · draft for reviewSeptember 202658 recordsNo addresses published

Add your projects to the inventory.
Nothing personal will be published.

If you designed, built, modeled, certified, or consulted on a high-performance retrofit of a rowhouse/brownstone/townhouse in the five boroughs, it is likely missing from published lists. We want this inventory to bridge that gap.

reBuild will never publish a street address, a block-and-lot, or an owner's name. Locations appear only as a ZIP code — and only where a ZIP holds three or more projects. A firm can be credited without its project being located, and a named party to any project can have its record reduced or removed on request.

What the search found

A floor, not a census

58
identified rowhouse retrofits, citywide
0.03%
of roughly 217,000 NYC rowhouses
1in 3,700
rowhouse properties
20
ZIP codes holding at least one project

Fifty-eight is everything we could find across registries, aggregators, press, and nine firms' own project lists. It is a count of what is visible, not of what exists.

Nine firm websites alone turned up 36 New York Passive House projects that no public aggregator listed, roughly doubling the rowhouse-retrofit count. One firm's direct list showed 16 certified rowhouse retrofits, of which only seven appear in the PHI database and none in Phius. The registries miss certified work, not just uncertified work. Every published count, including ours, is a floor.

Where they are

Concentrated, not diffused

Of the 45 projects whose ZIP code is known, 26 sit in five ZIP codes — and 19 of those in three adjoining Brooklyn neighborhoods: Brooklyn Heights–Cobble Hill, Carroll Gardens–Red Hook, and Park Slope. Everything else is reported at borough level.

Bronx Staten Island Brooklyn Queens Manhattan N
Borough outlines from NYC Open Data; circles drawn at ZIP-centroid resolution, fixed. A solid circle is a ZIP code with three or more projects, sized by count. A dashed circle is a borough-level count: projects in ZIPs with fewer than three, or known only by neighborhood.
ZIP with ≥3 projectsReported at borough level

ZIP-level counts are published only where a ZIP holds three or more projects. Below that, a ZIP code combined with a completion year and a performance standard identifies a specific house to anyone who knows the neighborhood, so those records are reported by borough.

What the records say

Certification is the wrong test

Certification signal, as stated by the source

"Built to Passive House standards" means the source made no certification claim either way; it does not mean uncertified. Seven projects are high-performance and deliberately uncertified, a category no registry records.

Completion year, where known

33 of 58 records carry a completion year. Twenty of those 33 come from one firm that supplied its own dated list, so every bar after 2019 is mostly that firm. Read this as a floor on activity, not a rate. Two 2026 entries are still being confirmed as complete.
Credits

Sources consulted

Passive House Institute — certified buildings databaseregistry
Phius — certified project databaseregistry
New York Passive House — member case studiescase studies
CityRealty — "NYC's Passive House Revolution"aggregator
Green Map NYC — "Passive House in New York City"aggregator
Nine practitioner websites and one firm's direct project listnamed as firms opt in

Firms are credited by name only when they ask to be. If your practice's work is here and you would like it credited, use the form above and choose "Performance, Type, ZIP code & team credit."

Disclosure policy

Why there are no addresses here

These are private homes. An address published alongside a gut-renovation scope and a completion year is a statement about a specific family's house, and neither we nor the practitioner who submitted a record has the standing to publish it.

Collected precisely, published coarsely. Addresses are recorded because the analysis needs them for de-duplication and for joining to city property data. They live in a restricted file that is never displayed and never exported. The public record resolves to a ZIP code at finest.
Small counts are suppressed. Where a ZIP holds fewer than three records, the location is reported at borough level.
Credit and location are separate consents. A firm can be named as the architect of a record whose location stays at borough level.
No map zooms to a house. Every published map is drawn at ZIP or borough resolution and cannot be zoomed past it.
Anyone named can remove a record. A named party to a project (including the owner) can ask for a record to be reduced or removed, and it is done without argument.
Cost is not collected here. The inventory holds no cost data and the public dataset will not include any.
Method

What counts, and how we looked

Inclusion

A residential rowhouse, brownstone, or townhouse in the five boroughs — attached, sharing party walls — undergoing a retrofit whose scope targets a whole-building envelope and systems intervention: continuous insulation, an air barrier, high-performance glazing, mechanical ventilation with heat recovery, and electrified heating. Certification is not required; uncertified deep retrofits are counted and are precisely the population certification databases cannot see. New construction and freestanding houses are excluded.

Sources searched

  • Passive House Institute certified buildings database (retrieved August 2026)
  • Phius certified project database (retrieved August 2026)
  • New York Passive House member case studies
  • CityRealty and Green Map NYC project lists
  • Nine practitioner websites, plus one firm's complete project list supplied on request

Known limits

A retrofit that was never certified, never published, and never listed by its firm is invisible to every source above. We assume there are more of these than we found and have no way to estimate how many. Firm-website rows record what each firm claims; certification signals were checked against the registries where a match could be made, and several PHI matches remain probable rather than proven because PHI publishes no street addresses. Landmark status for some records was read from historic-district boundaries rather than verified against LPC records.

The denominator

The rowhouse stock figure of roughly 217,000 is Neil Freeman's 2016 count from NYC PLUTO, using six criteria: attached, no more than 25 feet wide, street wall at least 92% of frontage, one to four units, residential building class, six stories or fewer.

Citation

reBuild Workshop (2026). NYC Rowhouse Retrofit Inventory, v1.0. Public-use file. Retrieved [date] from rebuildworkshop.com/inventory.
reBuild WorkshopCorrections, removals and submissions: info@rebuildworkshop.comDraft v0.9 · September 2026